🔗 Share this article

The US Justice Department has made another attempt to gain access to grand jury documents from the probe into the late financier, which ultimately led to his criminal charges in 2019.

Lawmakers' Move Drives Renewed Judicial Effort

The latest motion, prepared by the US attorney for the southern district, asserts that legislators made it clear when endorsing the publication of probe records that these court records should be released.

"The lawmakers' decision superseded current regulations in a manner that enables the unsealing of the grand jury records," stated the federal authorities.

Deadline Factors

The legal document asked the Manhattan federal court to proceed quickly in releasing the materials, pointing to the 30-day period set after the measure was enacted last week.

Earlier Request Faced Rejection

However, this new initiative comes after a prior petition from the former administration was denied by the presiding judge, who referenced a "important and persuasive factor" for preserving the records sealed.

In his summer decision, the judge observed that the seventy pages of sealed records and supporting materials, including a digital presentation, phone records, and letters from survivors and their attorneys, pale in comparison to the government's comprehensive accumulation of case-related documents.

"The government's 100,000 pages of case documents overwhelm the 70 odd pages," noted the magistrate in his judgment, observing that the petition appeared to be a "diversion" from disclosing documents already in the prosecution's control.

Nature of the Grand Jury Records

The sealed records primarily consist of the testimony of an federal investigator, who served as the lone witness in the grand jury proceedings and reportedly had "little firsthand information of the facts of the case" with testimony that was "mostly hearsay."

Security Issues

The presiding judge highlighted the "possible threats to victims' safety and privacy" as the persuasive factor for maintaining the documents restricted.

Parallel Case

A similar request to unseal sealed witness accounts concerning the criminal proceedings of his associate was also turned down, with the presiding judge observing that the prosecution's motion incorrectly suggested the grand jury materials contained an "unexplored treasure trove of undisclosed information" about the proceedings.

Recent Developments

The renewed request comes following closely the designation of a recently assigned lawyer to examine Epstein's relationships with prominent Democrats and a few months after the dismissal of one of the lead prosecutors working on the cases.

When inquired about how the ongoing investigation might influence the disclosure of case materials in federal custody, the Attorney General commented: "No further statements will be made on that because it is now a ongoing inquiry in the southern district."